RS vs. CR

Business Objects must be concerned about RS cutting into their market share.
CR 11 and CE 11 will now have cascading dynamic parameters similiar to RS.
After all the years of complaining to them. I'm still not switching back.
Liscensing costs are still a nightmare and they are eliminating concurrent
licesnses. Your choice is either processor or named licenses.In fact, Bus Obj is *increasing* the price for CR/CE 11. They haven't
smelled the coffee yet, it seems. *Any* software company that's in a market
niche into which MS is stepping should shake in their boots.
"johnE" wrote:
> Business Objects must be concerned about RS cutting into their market share.
> CR 11 and CE 11 will now have cascading dynamic parameters similiar to RS.
> After all the years of complaining to them. I'm still not switching back.
> Liscensing costs are still a nightmare and they are eliminating concurrent
> licesnses. Your choice is either processor or named licenses.|||I'm interested in where you heard about their new licensing costs. Can you
post some numbers?
"Columbia Kai" <ColumbiaKai@.discussions.microsoft.com> wrote in message
news:63EACCC0-7D5F-4ABB-A6C1-0C3F3D5F0F9E@.microsoft.com...
> In fact, Bus Obj is *increasing* the price for CR/CE 11. They haven't
> smelled the coffee yet, it seems. *Any* software company that's in a
market
> niche into which MS is stepping should shake in their boots.
> "johnE" wrote:
> > Business Objects must be concerned about RS cutting into their market
share.
> > CR 11 and CE 11 will now have cascading dynamic parameters similiar to
RS.
> > After all the years of complaining to them. I'm still not switching
back.
> > Liscensing costs are still a nightmare and they are eliminating
concurrent
> > licesnses. Your choice is either processor or named licenses.